Public perception often frames math and science avoidance, especially among girls and young women, as a matter of personal choice and innate preference. This framing suggests that math and science phobias are somehow self-inflicted, placing responsibility solely on the individual. However, this interpretation ignores the structural aspects that shape how children internalize confidence, identity, and a sense of belonging among their peers and across genders. For these reasons, math and science phobias are not a product of individual failure but an outcome of the continued presence of sexism in our society. Persistent gender stereotypes, biased expectations, and unequal representation collectively create an environment that discourages girls from pursuing STEM-related studies.

Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability begin influencing children before they can meaningfully choose their interests. A study cited in an EU report shows that by age six, girls begin associating brilliance and exceptional talent with boys rather than with their own gender. This early belief shapes how they interpret success and failure: when encountering difficulty in STEM, girls are more likely to see it as a sign that they “lack ability,” while boys interpret similar difficulty as a normal part of learning. This cognitive distortion is not self-generated, since it comes from the messages children absorb through parents, teachers, textbooks, media, and peers. When society repeatedly signals that high-level math or physics is a “male domain,” girls understandably develop insecurity around those same subjects.

Furthermore, sexism continues to influence the way educators interact with students. Teachers may not intentionally discriminate, but research conducted by the US Department of Education demonstrates that boys are more likely to be called on in math or science discussions, to receive more detailed feedback, and to be encouraged to take advanced courses. Yet girls, especially those who hesitate even briefly, are often redirected toward subjects perceived as more “fitting,” such as languages or the humanities. These patterns subtly teach girls that their participation in STEM is conditional and fragile, whereas boys’ participation is expected and welcomed. A student cannot “self-inflict” anxiety when the learning environment itself reproduces unequal expectations.

In conclusion, math and science phobias cannot be understood as an individual failure of motivation or courage. Rather, they are a symptom of the ongoing presence of sexism in society, manifested through stereotypes, educational bias, and lack of representation. To transform the landscape of STEM participation, society must eradicate systemic barriers rather than hold individuals accountable for anxieties they did not create. Girls do not withdraw from STEM because they fear it innately, yet they withdraw because sexism has made STEM a space where they are continually told, subtly or directly, that they do not belong. Recognizing this reality is the first step toward building an environment where all students can pursue math and science free from prejudice and structural constraints.

신시준 강남포스트 학생기자  webmaster@ignnews.kr

<저작권자 © 강남포스트, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지>